
Another blow has been dealt to the forces of destruction & despotism in the Middle East… not to mention those that would declare Iraq a failure & abandon it hastily!
Not only has Iraq had another successful election, it’s people have dealt a blow to Islamists by rejecting their parties & voting in an American ‘ally’.
Supreme Iraqi Election Board sources have said that after 90% of votes were counted, it was clear that Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki’s Law and Order list had taken nine of 14 provinces, including Baghdad, Basra, and Najaf, and that in the other five provinces other lists won.
Source: Al-Zaman, Iraq, February 4, 2009 via Memri translation
Reuters reports
Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki rode a nationalist, law-and-order message to a decisive victory over the Shi’ite religious parties who previously dominated Iraq, preliminary election results showed on Thursday.
…A group backed by Shi’ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr placed second in Baghdad with just 9 percent of the vote. In Basra, ISCI placed second with 11.6 percent.

Several observers have commented that Al-Maliki ran a “Western Style” campaign, favoring issues of law & order over religious rheotric. And he wasn’t the only one who benefitted from this tactic…
[Al-Maliki] campaigned with virtually no reference to religion, a tactic that seemed to appeal to voters exhausted by years of sectarian warfare.
Secularist and independent parties also fared well across Iraq, the results showed, after being largely swamped by religious parties in the last election in 2005.
By contrast, the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council (ISCI) — until now Iraq’s dominant Shi’a party — relied on religious images and slogans extensively throughout in its campaign, and did not win a single province.
A successful, relatively peaceful election; a rejection of Islamist parties; the victory of a secular, law & order, American-’ally’ – IT IS A GOOD DAY!
I am awaiting a comment from the Bush bashers – or will they give Obama the credit
.
This is yet another indication of the nation’s rehabilitation & positive progress. It means that millions of Iraqis are on the path to self-determination & freedom. These developments are a testament to George W. Bush, who remained steadfast despite the loss of prestige and popularity.
Had Democrats had their way and forced a premature retreat (they still might), then many of the Iraqis experiencing Democracy for the first time would instead be fighting for their lives. The last time America retreated prematurely, it did itself great deal of harm by abandoning those that heeded its call to rise up. These brave Shias & Kurds, along with their entire families were slaughtered by Saddam’s Mukabarat. It’s their remains that make up the mass ‘bone yards’ of Al-Mahawil.
A premature withdrawal this time would be far worse as it would endanger the great progress that has been made in that country. Such an act would not serve the best interests of Iraqis or Iraq’s fragile young democracy; it would dishonor the sacrifice made by Iraqi & American military & political branches; it would destabilize the region by creating a ‘hot zone’, not to mention taking away a great deterrent to Iran (the American army next door).
Long Live Democracy! Long Live a Free Secular Iraq!


3 responses so far ↓
anon // Feb 7, 2009 at 1:21 pm
Hahaha
Secular Al-Maliki??? I wonder what he was doing all the years of exile in Iran with his “Islamic Dawa party”.
1 Wingless // Feb 8, 2009 at 4:18 am
That’s hardly news… Everyone is aware of this party’s past…
The Islamic Dawa Party of then and the party of today are very different, at very least in how they conducted themselves during this election.
The fact remains: Iraqis overwhelmingly supported the secular, law and order message and rejected the Islamists, including the party aligned with terrorist Al Sadr. Surely this victory over tyranny & bloodshed is FAR MORE IMPORTANT than the name of a political party! (Care to explain how you could laugh at such a monumental world event?! Or are partisan ‘laugh-and-runs’ all you can muster? )
Do you have any evidence that it’s STILL an Islamist party OR that it ran a different campaign than what has been widely reported in Iraq? If so – please share…
Remember, even Western Parties have endorsed policies, laws & people in the past that have become bones in their well-locked (barricaded) closets.
2 BigBlack // Feb 8, 2009 at 4:59 am
Anon
Party’s change. When voting population demands new policies and an end to the brutal religious war the smart political parties will heed to the demands. This is the power democracy gives to populations and why its the best system in the world.
Even American Partys and their voter base totally change over time.
Blacks today vote Democrat mostly and most people in the USA associate Democrats as the party of the common man,the poor man, and minorities.
When Kanye West said George Bush don’t Care For Black People he might as well have said Republicans don’t care for white people and many would support him.
But people forget that abolitionist Abraham Lincoln was a Republican and that the whites in the south who pushed segregation were Dems!
“Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican president, and the white, segregationist politicians who governed Southern states in those days were Democrats. The Democratic Party didn’t welcome blacks then, and it wasn’t until 1924 that blacks were even permitted to attend Democratic conventions in any official capacity. Most blacks lived in the South, where they were mostly prevented from voting at all.”
http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/when_did_blacks_start_voting_democratic.html
Leave a Comment
0 trackbacks so far ↓